Continuous trade conflicts between the U.S. and China have exerted considerable stress on American tech enterprises, compelling them to adjust to unforeseen financial obstacles. Newly implemented tariffs by President Trump’s administration have altered the economic prospects for companies dependent on manufacturing in China. These strategies have resulted in higher expenses, disrupted supply chains, and heightened unpredictability for numerous tech companies, placing the industry in a fragile state.
Deena Ghazarian, who established Austere, an electronics firm located in California, felt the impact of these shifts directly. Not long after starting her company in 2019, she was confronted with an unexpected 25% tariff on the premium audio and video accessories imported from China. The business, which showed initial promise, rapidly became a financial challenge. The new expenses, absent before, jeopardized the company’s viability.
Deena Ghazarian, founder of the California-based electronics company Austere, experienced the brunt of these changes firsthand. Shortly after launching her business in 2019, she found herself facing a sudden 25% tariff on the high-end audio and video accessories her company imported from China. What began as a promising venture quickly turned into a financial struggle. The additional costs, which previously did not exist, threatened the survival of her business.
The existing tariff system greatly affects a variety of electronic products, such as smartphones, tablets, laptops, and video game consoles, many of which are primarily manufactured in China. As reported by the Consumer Technology Association (CTA), China continues to be the leading supplier of electronics to the U.S., with imports reaching $146 billion as recently as 2023. This comprises 78% of smartphones, 79% of laptops and tablets, and almost 87% of video game consoles entering the American market.
The economic impact of these tariffs is placed squarely on U.S. importers, not the Chinese manufacturers, resulting in American businesses and consumers bearing the financial strain. Ed Brzytwa, the CTA’s vice president of international trade, highlights that these extra costs frequently reach consumers as increased prices. For businesses with tight profit margins, transferring these expenses to customers becomes an inevitable step.
The financial burden of these tariffs falls directly on U.S. importers rather than manufacturers in China, leaving American businesses and consumers to shoulder the costs. Ed Brzytwa, vice president of international trade at the CTA, points out that these additional expenses often trickle down to shoppers in the form of higher prices. For companies operating on slim profit margins, passing these costs onto consumers becomes unavoidable.
Although certain companies have tried to find alternatives to Chinese manufacturing by moving supply chains to nations like Vietnam, Thailand, and India, these changes are neither swift nor economical. Mary Lovely, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, notes that building new supplier connections requires both time and significant resources. Furthermore, only a few countries can match the scale and proficiency that China provides, which continues to be a key player in worldwide technology production.
The tariffs form a part of a wider approach by the Trump administration aimed at tackling trade deficits, promoting domestic production, and curtailing the influx of illegal substances and migrants into the U.S. Nonetheless, these strategies have prompted backlash from major trading partners, such as Canada, Mexico, and China, increasing tensions and complicating global trade relationships.
The tariffs are part of a broader strategy by the Trump administration to address trade imbalances, encourage domestic manufacturing, and reduce the flow of illegal drugs and migrants into the U.S. However, the policies have sparked retaliation from key trade partners, including Canada, Mexico, and China, escalating tensions and complicating international trade relations.
For smaller companies like Austere, the enduring effects of these tariffs are a major worry. Ghazarian considers the option of increasing prices to counterbalance expenses but is concerned about losing customers in an already challenging economic climate. “There’s a threshold to what consumers are ready to pay for perceived value,” she notes. “If we exceed that, we risk losing them completely, particularly with inflation already squeezing household finances.”
For smaller businesses like Austere, the long-term consequences of these tariffs remain a primary concern. Ghazarian acknowledges the possibility of raising prices to offset costs but worries about alienating customers in an already strained economic environment. “There’s a limit to what customers are willing to pay for perceived value,” she says. “If we go beyond that, we risk losing them entirely, especially with inflation already tightening household budgets.”
The possibility of an economic downturn in the U.S. introduces an additional layer of complexity. Should growth slow, the administration might revisit its tariff strategy to prevent further economic harm. For the moment, though, the likelihood of relaxing trade barriers seems minimal, as Trump has indicated intentions to raise tariffs on Chinese products even further and expand duties to additional countries.
The effects of these policies reach beyond the United States. Should Chinese manufacturers move production to nations with elevated labor costs, worldwide prices for technology products might increase. Moreover, retaliatory tariffs from other countries could hinder the flow of U.S. technology exports, putting additional pressure on the industry.
Despite these hurdles, Ghazarian remains resolute in her efforts to adjust. By accumulating inventory prior to the imposition of the latest tariffs, she has secured short-term relief to endure the challenges. Looking forward, she is investigating ways to reduce expenses and exploring different production techniques to sustain her business. “I had hoped to concentrate on expansion and innovation, but instead, a significant portion of my time is devoted to survival tactics,” she expresses.
Despite these challenges, Ghazarian remains determined to adapt. By stockpiling inventory before the latest tariffs went into effect, she has gained temporary relief to weather the storm. Looking ahead, she is exploring cost-cutting measures and alternative production methods to keep her business afloat. “I had hoped to focus on growth and innovation, but instead, so much of my time is spent on survival strategies,” she laments.
The ongoing trade war underscores the delicate balance between economic policy and its unintended consequences. While the administration’s tariffs aim to achieve broader geopolitical goals, they have created ripple effects that reverberate through industries and households alike. For U.S. tech firms, the road ahead will require resilience, adaptability, and a willingness to navigate an increasingly uncertain global trade landscape.
